The Government and Gold - Understanding the Two G's.

Posted On Thursday, Nov 01, 2012


I have often heard a phrase saying "Time is the best healer". But is it really so? I have no clue but it seems that the policy mindset firmly believes in buying time in order to solve the economic malaise facing their economies. In a bid to buy more time the Fed chairman pumped in another round of steroids to help the ailing economy recover.

Bernanke is hoping that homes, capital equipment, and employees now considered unnecessary will somehow gain value if there are simply more dollars chasing them. It is questionable why all this pumping should revive the economy given that the zero-interest-rate policy and the over $2 trillion in monetary pumping since 2008 haven`t been successful. We suggest that by introducing further massive monetary pumping Bernanke is running the risk of severely damaging the US economy. Consequently, this raises the likelihood that the US could remain in a depressed economic state for a prolonged period of time.

There are a few misconceptions that need to be cleared and few points that need to be reiterated.

Was it really done to help the economy or is there a hidden agenda to it?

Reading the policy mindset, QE3 was inevitable. However, as afar as the timing goes, the presidential elections in the U.S could have been the prime driver behind this. Earlier we had seen that the Fed would wait until signs of deflation scare before switching on its money printing spree. Reading between the lines; it`s a remarkable change in strategy i.e. without any immediate need going by the drivers the FED watches. It really looks like been undertaken to boost obama’s chances of a reelection bringing in the recency effect.

Obama has been urging voters to give him more time to prove himself. But what he has been doing is just buying more time with the help of Bernanke and aggravating the problem. It would have been beneficial if he had taken stringent measures though politically unviable would have gone a long way to prove his credentials. Obamanomics has failed completely to what people were seeing as a hope of change for betterment.

Chart: Expected Inflation Expectations

Expected Inflation Expectations

Data Source: Bloomberg

The above chart shows the spread between the yields on standard 10-year T-Notes and 10-year inflation-protected Treasury Notes. It is a good proxy to depict the inflationary expectations measured by the markets in a particular economy; U.S in this case. If you observe in the above charts the circle marks the points where earlier rounds of QEs were unannounced. The inflationary expectations at that point in time were much lower to provide Fed with a justification for monetary easing. But this time around inflation expectations were already at multi year highs which is a big change in strategy and extremely disastrous over the long term.

The root of the problem is unwavering commitment to bad economic theory, so that when the economy doesn`t respond as expected to a certain dosage a higher dosage is automatically considered appropriate. This program emarked on buying mortgage secrutities and no treasury securities was primarily to keep Romney’s allegations of Fed funding the deficit at bay. Post the elections there could be another round of QE or atleast a modified QE that includes treasury purchases as well.

Mr. Romney, your allegations are correct.

Growth in government is enabled because a government with a captive central bank will never run short of money, irrespective of how big its deficits become and how far into debt it goes.

One or the primary objective of the Fed has been to help government to deficit spend. The below given chart provides an evidence of the spending spree undertaken by the U.S federal government. If you carefully observe, the initial years show a flattish line meaning no growth in spending upto 1913 i.e. until the Federal Reserve came into existence. Post that there has been continuous growth in government spending which was possible only with the help of an agency like Federal Reserve. Prior to the Fed, spending was just 3% of GDP. Currently, US federal government spending equates to about 24% of GDP.

Chart: U.S Government spending (% of GDP)

U.S Government spending (% of GDP)

Would a change in government i.e. a Republican victory in this year`s US Presidential election reverse the upward trend in the size of the federal government?

Looks extremely unlikely. Historically, government spending has increased by more during Republican administrations then compared to the Democratic ones. Romney like previous republican candidates who have assumed power is making promises of reducing the size of governments. It’s not happened in past to make us believe it will happen this time either. Republicans are generally in favour of boosting the amount of money spent on the military. An increase in military spending is always politically viable to accomplish and is the most unproductive of all spending.

U.S Federal Govenment Size by President/Political Party

So, a Romney victory in November would probably change the composition of the federal budget, but its looks extremely unlikely that it would result in curbing government spending. Regardless of who wins in November, it`s a good bet that the US federal government will be a bigger part of the economy four years from now than it is today. And as always, the government growth will be enabled by the Federal Reserve.


The reason no viable solution is being offered is that we have no viable solution. America and much of the rest of the world has effectively mortgaged their future and we have finally come close to the day of reckoning. Until then, gold will likely continue to increase in its value against the monetary debasement undertaken by governments across the globe.

The views expressed in this article are the personal views of the Fund Manager of Quantum Gold Fund. The views constitute only the opinions and do not constitute any guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader. This information is meant for general reading purpose only and is not meant to serve as a professional guide/investment advice for the readers. This article has been prepared on the basis of publicly available information, internally developed data and other sources believed to be reliable. Readers are advised to seek independent professional advice and arrive at an informed investment decision before making any investments.

Statutory Details and Risk Factors:
Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks, read all scheme related documents carefully.
Risk Factors: All Mutual Funds and securities investments are subject to market risks and there can be no assurance that the scheme`s objective will be achieved and the NAV of the scheme(s) may go up or down depending upon the factors and forces affecting securities markets.
Investors in the Scheme(s) are not being offered a guaranteed or assured rate of return. Investment in mutual fund units involves investment risks such as trading volumes, settlement risk, liquidity risk, default risk including possible loss of capital. Past performance of the Sponsor / AMC/ Mutual Fund does not indicate the future performance of the Scheme(s). Statutory Details: Quantum Mutual Fund (the Fund) has been constituted as a Trust under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882. Sponsor: Quantum Advisors Private Limited. (liability of Sponsor limited to Rs. 1,00,000/-) Trustee: Quantum Trustee Company Private Limited. Investment Manager: Quantum Asset Management Company Private Limited (AMC). The Sponsor, Trustee and Investment Manager are incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956.

Above article is authored by Quantum.

View All

  • Balancing Act: The Coalition Government and Markets in India
    Balancing Act: The Coalition Government and Markets in India

    Posted On Tuesday, Jun 11, 2024

    Let's explore how the current coalition government may impact your investments. The Indian stock market is a barometer of the country's economic health and is shaped by the prevailing political environment.

    Read More
  • Gold Monthly View for May 2024
    Gold Monthly View for May 2024

    Posted On Thursday, Jun 06, 2024

    Starting the month of May near the $2286 per ounce level, gold saw a $150 movement during the month touching a fresh all-time peak of $2420 largely buoyed by rising geopolitical tensions.

    Read More
  • Polls to Portfolios: A Robust Portfolio with Quantum in Post-Election India
    Polls to Portfolios: A Robust Portfolio with Quantum in Post-Election India

    Posted On Wednesday, Jun 05, 2024

    The election season may be over, but the journey for your investments is ongoing.

    Read More

Add To Cart

Add To Cart

Your cart is empty
Total of Lumpsum

Get In Touch

Take small steps in your financial planning to achieve big dreams! Start your investment journey today!

@@tlcomstart@@ @@tlcomend@@